Table 2 Two-way ANOVA results for delay and trace fear conditioning
From: Post-conditioning sleep deprivation facilitates delay and trace fear memory extinction
Figure | Task | Trials | Main Effect of Sex | Main Effect of State | Sex x State Interaction |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Figure 3C1 | Delay | Conditioning | F (1, 35) = 0.25, p = 0.6207 | F (1, 35) = 0.09, p = 0.7637 | F (1, 35) = 0.02, p = 0.8896 |
Figure 3C2 | Delay | Early Extinction #1 | F (1, 35) = 11.61, p = 0.0017 | F (1, 35) = 2.52, p = 0.1217 | F (1, 35) = 0.43, p = 0.5179 |
Figure 3C3 | Delay | Late Extinction #1 | F (1, 35) = 18.84, p = 0.0001 | F (1, 35) = 1.39, p = 0.2456 | F (1, 35) = 0.37, p = 0.5444 |
Figure 3C4 | Delay | Remote Recall | F (1, 35) = 9.37, p = 0.0042 | F (1, 35) = 8.56, p = 0.006 | F (1, 35) = 0.03, p = 0.8694 |
Figure 3C5 | Delay | Early Extinction #2 | F (1, 35) = 11.93, p = 0.0015 | F (1, 35) = 7.4, p = 0.0101 | F (1, 35) = 0.83, p = 0.3682 |
Figure 3C6 | Delay | Late Extinction #2 | F (1, 35) = 6.36, p = 0.0164 | F (1, 35) = 3.7, p = 0.0627 | F (1, 35) = 0.39, p = 0.5345 |
Figure 4B1 | Trace | Conditioning | F (1, 35) = 2.29, p = 0.139 | F (1, 35) = 0.04, p = 0.8381 | F (1, 35) = 0.56, p = 0.4607 |
Figure 4B2 | Trace | Early Extinction #1 | F (1, 35) = 3.79, p = 0.0596 | F (1, 35) = 0.21, p = 0.6514 | F (1, 35) = 0.44, p = 0.5135 |
Figure 4B3 | Trace | Late Extinction #1 | F (1, 35) = 0.47, p = 0.4968 | F (1, 35) = 4.86, p = 0.0341 | F (1, 35) = 0.75, p = 0.3929 |
Figure 4B4 | Trace | Remote Recall | F (1, 35) = 0.43, p = 0.5164 | F (1, 35) = 3.58, p = 0.0668 | F (1, 35) = 0.66, p = 0.4217 |
Figure 4B5 | Trace | Early Extinction #2 | F (1, 35) = 0.38, p = 0.5398 | F (1, 35) = 0.55, p = 0.4613 | F (1, 35) = 1.98, p = 0.1682 |
Figure 4B6 | Trace | Late Extinction #2 | F (1, 35) = 0.01, p = 0.9181 | F (1, 35) = 0.00, p = 0.9634 | F (1, 35) = 2.09, p = 0.157 |