Post-conditioning sleep deprivation facilitates delay and trace fear memory extinction

Table 4 Timeline summary of freezing decrease by SD in delay and trace fear conditioning

		Conditioning	Initial recall	Early Extinction #1	Late Extinction #1	Remote recall	Early Extinction #2	Late Extinction #2
Delay	Figures	2 A, 3C₁	2B	3C₂, 5A₁ (♂), 5B₁ (♀)	3C₃, 5A₂ (♂), 5B₂ (♀)	3C₄, 5A₃ (♂), 5B₃ (♀)	3C₅, 5A₄ (♂), 5B₄ (♀)	3C₆, 5A₅ (♂), 5B₅ (♀)
Delay	SD effects	n.s.	n.s.	n.s.	n.s.	p < 0.01 for 3C₄ (both sex) and 5B₃ (♀), p < 0.05 for 5A₃ (♂)	p < 0.01 for 5B₄ (♀), p < 0.05 for 3C₅ (both sex)	n.s.
Trace	Figures	2 A, 4B₁	2B	4B₂, 6A₁ (♂), 6B₁ (♀)	4B₃, 6A₂ (♂), 6B₂ (♀)	4B₄, 6A₃ (♂), 6B₃ (♀)	4B₅, 6A₄ (♂), 6B₄ (♀)	4B₆, 6A₅ (♂), 6B₅ (♀)
Trace	SD effects	n.s.	n.s.	n.s.	p < 0.05 for 4B₃ (both sex) and 6B₂ (♀)	n.s.	n.s.	n.s.

Summary of figure panels and significant effects of SD on freezing responses across trial sets in delay and trace fear conditioning. SD reduced freezing responses during Remote recall and early Extinction #2 in delay fear conditioning, and during late Extinction #1 in trace fear conditioning

ISSN: 1756-6606